TUESDAY, 10 May

Day 2 – Tuesday May, 10 (CET)

11:15 - 12:45

Societies as cognitive symphonies – Building better simulations based on universal cognitive modules

By Loïs Vanhée, Umeå University, Sweden
Nanda Wijermans, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Sweden

Modelling human-like decisions is an intrinsic component of any agent-based simulations. However, often the decision representation of observed behaviour is justified by ad-hoc explanations – making our models very specific, difficult to motivate, and dependent on extensive hidden implicit assumptions. We observe that many decision models share extensive commonalities – often implicitly: in nearly all models, agents actions are driven by and adapted to a ‘context’ and with an emphasis on ‘relational’ environment with other agents – social simulations require a society. In this session, we want to empower the participants with foundations from a cognitive perspective to strengthen the grounding and solidity of their decision models. We will organise an interactive session in which participants discuss re-conceptualising context and relationship; revisit their own models from this new perspective; and discuss the future of cognition-centred development for social simulation.

Schedule

11:15 – 11:20 Welcome
11:20 – 11:30 Intro & discussion cognitive component 1: context
11:30 – 11:50 Break out groups cognitive component 1: context
11:50 – 12:00 Gathering insights from discussions & Closing topic 1
12:00 – 12:10 Intro & discussion cognitive component 2: relation
12:10 – 12:30 Break out groups cognitive component 2: relation
12:30 – 12:40 Gathering insights from discussions & Closing topic 2
12:40 – 12:45 Closing

12.45 – 13:30

Lunch Break

 

13.30 - 15:00

Smalltalk about big things: Validation

By Harko Verhagen, Stockholm University, Sweden
Melania Borit, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
Nanda Wijermans, Stockholm University, Sweden 

Given the hot discussion on the SimSoc mailing list a while back – with Edmund Chattoe-Brown throwing the proverbial stone in the SimSoc pond – where validation and (amongst others) opinion dynamics were debated, now we can have a synchronous follow-up on this with a group of invitees presenting their ideas and views, followed by Zoom break-outs in smaller groups before having another round.

Guests
Edmund Chattoe-Brown, University of Leicester, UK
Patrycja Antosz, Norce, Norway
Juliette Rouchier, Lamsade, France
Frank Dignum, Umeå University, Sweden
Wander Jager, University of Groningen, the Netherlands

15:00– 15:15

Break

 

15.15 - 16:45

Cont. Smalltalk about big things: Validation

By Harko Verhagen, Stockholm University, Sweden
Melania Borit, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
Nanda Wijermans, Stockholm University, Sweden 

Given the hot discussion on the SimSoc mailing list a while back – with Edmund Chattoe-Brown throwing the proverbial stone in the SimSoc pond – where validation and (amongst others) opinion dynamics were debated, now we can have a synchronous follow-up on this with a group of invitees presenting their ideas and views, followed by Zoom break-outs in smaller groups before having another round.

Guests
Edmund Chattoe-Brown, University of Leicester, UK
Patrycja Antosz, Norce, Norway
Juliette Rouchier, Lamsade, France
Frank Dignum, Umeå University, Sweden
Wander Jager, University of Groningen, the Netherlands